… ahem.

/… ahem.

People behave like jerks, make threatening remarks, harass people, advocate for policies and propositions that will cause actual harm to others, and then get angry if other people take offense. They try to hide behind the idea of free speech—they’re just expressing themselves, and everyone has a right to do that, right? But the defense is built on one or more false equivalencies. The most basic is equating disagreement with censorship. If you say that all Freedonians are criminals, and I point out that isn’t true, and show the statistics to prove it, you haven’t been silenced. If other people decide the don’t want to listen to your rants about the evils of the Freedonians anymore, they stop inviting you to their social events and if you show up uninvited they ask you to leave, that also isn’t silencing you.

fontfolly is unintentionally prescient.

What do you call it when it’s a subtweet except it’s a blog post of a quote from someone unrelated to the original issue but who happened to say a completely relevant thing anyway?

Because whatever that is, that’s what this post is.

2018-02-13T08:01:16+00:00 13th February, 2018|Tags: culture|Comments Off on … ahem.