A really good, clear, simple break down about the problems with “call-out culture”.
Dave Rupert is trying to bring back RSS (as an alternative to social media), by providing RSS-only content.
For me, RSS never went away; I’ve been using a self-hosted RSS reading solution since, like, before Google Reader died, and while the UI is kinda janky and it stopped syncing with my thick client reader when I migrated to CloudFlare, it’s still how I consume like 90% of all my stuff on the web.1 All those links I post? Yeah, they come through my feed reader.2
RSS in the modern web can be a bit crap, but most major blogging platforms and news sites support it in some fashion even if a lot of content isn’t as well-optimized for it as it used to be. Hell, even Tumblr supports RSS, and Tumblr is probably the social media platform least suited to it, so go figure.
The point of all of which is to say RSS is still great and was, in its day, the cornerstone of the oldskool open web. And anyone chafing at the confines of their digital feudal lord’s walled garden3 could do a lot worse than rediscovering the technology…
- The other ten percent? Split between Twitter, Mastodon, and Tumblr. ^
- If I read something I want to make a post about, I star it in my reader. I then have a script that takes all the starred items our of the database and sends them to Instapaper. There’s another script that pulls things out of Instapaper and posts them as drafts to my blog. Why the Instapaper intermediate step? It’s so I can also flag things I find outside of the RSS reader, either from the aforementioned social media sources, or from following links in other articles. ^
- … lol. ^
It’s long been an anecdotal truism for people who work in interrogation-related fields—from policing to intelligence—that rapport-building techniques work much better for extracting information than verbal or physical coercion. The problem was the science wasn’t behind them, mostly due to the difficulty of studying a field where most of the evidence is classified.
Well. A pair of researches have overcome that obstacle, and been able to empirically assert what’s long been suspected: torture doesn’t work. And, specifically, it doesn’t work when compared to other, less confrontational, techniques.
I was asked a question on a panel once that was something along the lines of what advice I’d give to aspiring authors. My answer was that they should let go of the idea that everyone should “like” their writing.1 “Heaps of people hate Stephen King, whose stuff I love,” I said, “and love JK Rowling, whose stuff I can’t stand. And no-one at all defends Dan Brown, yet he still manages to be a bestseller!”
Having said that, a week or so later, I read this.
Incidentally, I think “not very clever media designed to make men feel they’re very clever” is probably a genre in-and-of-itself. And a lucrative one at that…
- I stand by this. It’s anecdotal, but still one of the biggest dividers I’ve found between novelists who’re successfully published and those who, uh, will probably never be. The former tend to understand things like audiences, markets, and YKINMKATOK. The latter, no so much… and often like to make sweeping generalizations about the “universality” of certain subjective plot lines, tropes, and authors while they’re at it. ^
How to make a knife out of a roll of aluminium foil.
It seems like this entire channel’s Thing is making kitchen knives out of improbable substances. See also the clingfilm knife, chocolate candy knife, and pasta knife (which is then cooked and eaten… and then the plate turned into another knife) for example. The fact that most of these knives end up being better than my actual kitchen knives is… probably a hint I should get my knives professionally sharpened.
Crucially, [Andrea] Dworkin’s feminism, however outdated some of it seems today, was one propelled by ideas, rather than feelings — the idea that men are bad rather than the feeling that they are, the idea that all men should be castrated rather than the feeling that they should be (I’m extrapolating a bit here). The false choices of modern feminism — Women are “empowered!” They work! AND they have babies now! And they do twice the amount of work as a man for less money! Slay! — have led us to a place of complacency, where what we feel takes precedence over what we think.
Leah Finnegan on liberal feminism.
The article is about the fallout from the Weinstein assault allegations, so obvious content warning at the article, although the actual incidents aren’t discussed in details. Also obligatory disclaimer for Dworkin, whose second-wave-radical-feminist views on trans people have been… not always that great.